|
Transparent process
All GFIA output is documented in a proprietary decision system, which is transparent to substantial clients.
Manager identification… • GFIA studies and maintains research on a broad universe of appropriate managers. • Long history and visibility of its principals means that GFIA has good visibility of new propositions. • Initial deskwork screens the universe in order to target research time
Manager familiarization… • Typically 5-20 analyst-hours of face time with the manager, spread over multiple meetings. • Monitoring of returns and portfolio evolution over 3-24 months
Due diligence… • A separate activity from manager assessment, conducted immediately prior to an intended investment, to verify all information for accuracy and completeness. • GFIA’s process is modelled on institutional best practice and focuses on operational and personnel risks.
Portfolio construction… • GFIA’s portfolios are constructed with risk-weighted position sizing, focusing on drawdown risk rather than volatility, as well as effective diversification, for risk mitigation. Monitoring... • Semi-annual manager site visits. • Modelling of underlying funds’ risk exposure over time • Immediate portfolio review following exceptional returns (+ve/-ve) • Due diligence repeated after substantial events
Manager exit • Impairment of information flow triggers instant redemption • Movement away from core competences, inappropriate asset size, extended unexplained performance issues, will trigger review and possible redemption • Tactical positions may be exited at the resolution of the expected event or market development
Disciplined manager assessment • Assessment process generates 52, mostly qualitative, metrics about each fund emphasis on structure, organization, asset size and growth, and integrity of the manager • Internally developed database creates a 7-point rating for each fund • Each fund receives a quantified overall assessment • The screen acts as a benchmark and evaluation tool to underpin manager and fund selection
|